Skip to content
Canuck Harvest

A United Ireland Plebiscite Should Not Transform Into 'A Repeat of Brexit', Experts Warn

A decade following the UK entered into a hurried public vote that split the nation and triggered disorder, a advisory comes from across the Irish Sea: it might repeat.

The government and voters drifted into Brexit and the similar may happen with a national vote on a unified Ireland, sparking upheavals for which no one is ready.

That represents the warning from two prominent commentators from each side of the Irish border who have collaborated to analyse the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to form a new state with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Institutions Unprepared

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have determined that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a potentially contentious and transformative referendum.

"The lesson of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that stuff can emerge unexpectedly and can build support very quickly," the commentator stated. "It is my view that the political architecture of our archipelago remains very unstable."

Book Publication Aims to Stir Debate

The team have studied the governmental, economic and cultural reasons for any structural alteration in a volume, The Case For and Against Unification, issued by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to provoke discussion on the matter with a series of speaking events that will lead them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What troubles everybody, or ought to concern every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," commented O’Toole.

"We should prevent a referendum on a binary, unclear proposal whose implications have not been spelled out because then you end up with an extraordinarily divided society where those defeated are unable to accept defeat and the people who have won lack clarity precisely what it is that they have gained."

Legal Framework

Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland official is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unification if it seems probable that a majority would approve.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups say such a time is imminent, and a group named pro-unification advocates has built momentum, but both governments and pro-UK factions play down the prospect, making it uncertain whether or when there will be a referendum.

Lack of Serious Debate

Political rhetoric for and against unity has obscured the absence of substantive discussion, said McBride.

"People tend to be for or against the notion but the detailed consideration which may surpass that to achieve it has largely not occurred. A great deal has taken place in academia but scarcely any politicians or campaigners are willing to participate with even the fundamentals. As an example, what sort of state should be desired? Unitary? Decentralised?"

Volume's Strategy

In the volume, no writer advocates unity or the current situation. Each writes two articles that strive for neutrality in presenting the rationale for a united Ireland and the rationale opposing it, gathering financial and social statistics, past examples and governmental frameworks.

Discussions encompass flags and symbols, duties, healthcare systems, retirement funds, sovereign debt obligations and the risk of pro-UK militancy. The objective is to enlighten and encourage conversation.

"There's huge interest in the issue but there is still lacking a dialogue," commented O’Toole. "Dialogue implies an acknowledgement of the notion that there might be valid points on either side."

Parallel Votes

A public vote in Northern Ireland would simultaneously prompt one in the Republic of Ireland, where the electorate claim they support unity but oppose paying higher taxes or adopting a alternative symbol to acknowledge pro-UK communities' British culture.

"Authorities in Dublin must establish what the offer from nationalist groups is beyond just declaring: 'We want a unified Ireland and we love you'," said the commentator.

Possibility of Public Vote

The journalist thinks a national vote in his lifetime is possible and that it may take place abruptly. "You could have just a reckless or a poor or a negligent government minister who states: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"

Each of the pro-unification advocates and pro-UK supporters have credible, valid perspectives, he commented. "Somebody will succeed in this matter and the other side will ultimately lose but each side has has important lessons to acquire from the alternative arguments."

Call for Broader Dialogue

Westminster must engage with the dialogue, stated the analyst. "This is about Britain. It is a British issue equally as it is an Irish issue."

By

Erin Davis

A tech enthusiast and entertainment critic with a passion for exploring the latest streaming trends and innovations.

Canuck Harvest

Type to search articles.